Republican Agenda: GOP Theocracy

I clearly have as much trouble as the next person sussing out thoughtful debate from passionate feelings, and I am trying to be pragmatic, sticking to the issues rather than beat up on the other side just for daring to have opinions that differ from mine.

But shit, can you believe the crap that has been coming out of the mouths of Republican’s this week? These gems of the GOP (Gods of the People) like Todd Akin whose absurd claims of “legitimate rape” enraged women everywhere, to the Ohioan election board member admitting to blocking black voters by prohibiting the hours they’re most likely to vote. Could they make it any harder to take them seriously as intellectual human beings?

I do appreciate that GOP leader Mitt Romney and his running mate Paul Ryan swiftly denounced Todd Akin and called for him to withdraw his nomination, though it struck me as superfluous—of course he refused to do so.  Shocker?

How serious his fellow Republican’s were in their rebukes it’s hard to ascertain. Given the outrage of Akin’s “legitimate rape” condescension, I’m sure GOP damage control required a few members to speak out wholesale against the representative, but how many were out of genuine disgust and disagreement?

I give Senator Scott Brown of Massachusetts props for his sincerity and hope he continues to maintain his distance from the looser canons of his party. Perhaps, his will be the mantle more moderate Republican will pick-up in coming years. One can only hope the younger, more estrogen enriched members of Republican party come to their senses and drag the GOP into the 21st century.

I guess I’ll just let their modus operandi of their own demise work its magic and get back to what is really troubling me, more so than the racist, misogyny trending through the GOP right now.

Acts Unbecoming An American

The problem presently troubling me isn’t merely one of differing philosophies but rather the Republican’s outright betrayal of our Constitutional right to privacy and freedom from religion through the continued attacks on women’s reproductive health, marriage between same sex couples, and the insistence upon their religious views guiding the conscious of our nation.

I don’t see how else you can view it other than an outright attack on our hard fought American rights to liberty. It’s downright un-American.

Reading the GOP website I’m struck by the contradictions between their assertion that their party is for less government, limited regulations, and a constituency free from interventionist, when their calls to action run to the contrary.

The number of bills and restrictions they’ve added which limit and intervene in personal matters such as those between loved ones, and between you and your doctors, adding layer upon layer of red tape, and regulations to our already burden legislature—more government regulations infringing upon our personal freedoms than I ever thought possible, is moving us backward in time.

Examine the movement of the GOP’s agenda the last couple of dozen years and you begin to get the picture of an ever more single mindedness to the Republican party line.

They have perfected the art of making issues out of private matters in order to fuel emotionally charged topics they think will incite people to act on their behalf, and provoke division where  tolerance once grew strong.

Fear-mongering for Votes.

You may have seen an old photo making its way around Facebook of a man holding a sign the reads:

I Want You To Stop Being Afraid Of Other Americans
of Other Religions
of Other Classes
of Other Nations
of Speaking Out
You’re Americans.
Act Like it!
(If you don’t get it, ask an American who does)

It really does sum up a problem we are having as a nation. We seem to have lost our ability to have thoughtful debate without vilifying and demonizing our opponents.

A lot of it has to do with how communications have changed. The autonomy and reach of the web has built vast networks bringing the ability to preach your gospel to tens of thousands all the while filtering out views that don’t agree with yours. There-in lies a big problem.

Narrowing down information to only those that support your views is like being fed a steady diet of only sugar. It’s going to make you sick, fat, and lazy. Now we are one big lazy-ass nation of fear mongers so scared we won’t “win” we’ve forgotten how to compromise. We’ve forgotten how vital compromise is to our well-being as nation and individuals.

Instead of concessions, we rather lose it all and proudly boast of our efforts. But any gambler will tell you, all or nothing is a losers bet.

A Compromising Position

Poor Stephen Covey, father of win-win solutions must be turning over in his grave. As are the founding fathers, the great men of compromise whose grueling work gave us our whole system of checks and balances meant to engender compromise throughout. From the Supreme court, to the Legislator, to the President, compromise has kept it running free from tyranny all these years.

Free until now. The political agenda of today is all or nothing, an attitude that runs counter to the whole system. And what do Americans get from that kind of political back-up? Sewage.

We all need a refresher course on duty. The beauty of our Constitution is that we each count, everyone of us and it behooves the government to ensure our individual rights—that is our social contract. The government and by which I mean those who serve it, are duty bound to uphold these ideals.

“It details how the more perfect union was to be carried out between the national government and the people. The people are to be provided (a) justice, (b) civil peace, (c) common defense, (d) those things of a general welfare that they could not provide themselves, and (e) freedom. A government of “liberty and union, now and forever”, unfolds when “We” begin and establish this Constitution.”

Presently, the ultra-conservatives, far-right leaning Republicans and Tea Baggers are working diametrically opposed to the very foundation of what makes our country great.

Namely, the very first amendment of the Bill of Rights.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

No law respecting an establishment of religion! Clearly this means you cannot use your religion, your religious values, to enact laws governing all the people. For you to do so imposes and insinuates your religion onto others.

That’s supposed to be the litmus test for right and wrong in America. Does your view point inhibit the rights of another? No matter if that agenda is to protect a second party as in abortion. You can not impose your belief system on another. No altruistic buts, simply put, does your personal view trespass another’s right?

Clearly, barring medical treatments, legislating birth control, denying licenses to same-sex couples, blocking voters, all these actions are meant to dominate and control, hold power over others, and erodes the rights of civil liberties afford to us all.

The government is charged with protecting us from those infringement so why would you vote in those whose disrespect and pledge to act in direct opposition of what protects us. Isn’t that a betrayal of the social contract? And isn’t that called treason?